Optimized Hybrid Energy Efficient Clustered Protocol for Heterogeneous IoT Wireless Sensor Network
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years the Wireless Sensor Networks have become very popular due to the latest advancement and innovation in the micro electrical mechanical system which creates more opportunities to utilise the WSNs with their outstanding capability of sensing various type of environmental as well as other conditions. WSNs are comprised of large number of small and less expensive sensor nodes, these nodes communicate with one another with different set of rules called protocols. Performance of sensor node is generally affected by some protocols. There are nodes which are always operated on battery power therefore the energy utilisation will always be the prime concern of WSNs. The same analogy is applied for the WSNs in cyber physical system and for IoT milieu where different types of nodes or end devices have been found with different amount of initial energy. The proposed protocol therefore links the difference between the physical sensor networks and the genuine heterogeneous Cyber IoT environment. The paper shows the comparison between the Hy-IoT [1] and proposed by using the performance measures shown in result section.
Downloads
Article Details
References
IoT heterogeneous network. Future Computing and Informatics
Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, 166-177.
[2] R. W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan and H. Balakrishnan.
(2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless
microsensor networks. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences, USA.
[3] Smaragdakis, G. a. Matta, I. a. Bestavros and Azer. (2004). A stable election
protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks.
Boston University Computer Science Department.
[4] S. Faisal, Javaid, Nadeem, Javaid, K. Akmal and M. e. a. Ashraf. (2013)
Z-SEP: Zonal-stable election protocol for wireless sensor networks.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.5364.
[5] P. Sethi and S. R. Sarangi. (2017). Internet of Things: Architectures,
Protocols, and Applications. Journal of Electrical and Computer
Engineering, vol. 2017, p. 25.
[6] S. Tyagi and N. Kumar. (2013) A systematic review on clustering and
routing techniques based upon LEACH protocol for wireless sensor
networks. J. Network and Computer Applications, vol. 36, pp. 623-645.
[7] M. Malik, Y. Singh and A. Arora. (2013). Analysis of LEACH protocol in
wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Research
in Computer Science and Software Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2.
[8] D. Zeng, Guo, Song and Z. Cheng. (2011). The web of things: A survey.
JCM, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 424-438.
[9] A. Floris Van den, H. Jeroen, M. Ingrid and D. Piet. (2015). Integration
of Heterogeneous Devices and Communication Models via the Cloud
in the Constrained Internet of Things. International Journal of
Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 11, no. 10.
[10] Nalluri, S. K., & Parasaram, V. K. B. (2015). Automating Software
Builds with Jenkins: Design Patterns and Failure Handling.
International Journal of Technology, Management and Humanities,
1(01), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.21590/ijtmh.01.02.03
[11] Satish Kumar Nalluri, Venkata Krishna Bharadwaj Parasaram.
(2019). Software-Centric Automation Frameworks Integrating AI
and Cybersecurity Principles. International Journal of Engineering
Science & Humanities, 9(1), 30–40. Retrieved from
https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/539
[12] W. Heinzelman, Rabiner, Kulik, Joanna and H. Balakrishnan. (1999). Adaptive
Protocols for Information Dissemination in Wireless Sensor Networks.
Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile
Computing and Networking, Seattle, Washington, USA.
[13] Smaragdakis, G. Matta, Ibrahim, Bestavros and Azer. (2004). SEP: A stable
election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor
networks. Boston University Computer Science Department, Boston.